The principle
TEB is the annual gross income arising from economic activity or assets for which the issuer’s human capital — past or present — is the proximate cause.
Formally, for an issuer over an interval :
Each income event is evaluated against two tests (next section). If either passes, the income is in; otherwise it’s out. The inclusion is a binary: TEB does not have partial weights for “mostly labor-derived” income.
Why it matters —The principle approach replaces an enumerable list with a decidable test. Lists become out of date the moment a new income type appears (DAOs, content royalties, AI-revenue shares); the principle stays valid because it’s framed at the level of economic causation, not instrument enumeration.
The two-test framework
Test 1 · Labor origination
Does the income arise from labor — current, past, deferred, or in-kind — performed by the issuer?
| ✓ Examples (in TEB) | Why |
|---|---|
| W-2 wages, salary, bonus | Direct compensation for current labor. |
| 1099 self-employment income | Pass-through compensation for own labor. |
| RSU vesting at FMV on vest | Deferred compensation for past labor; cash-equivalent at vest. |
| Founder equity sale proceeds (ISO/NSO exercise + sale) | Realized compensation for founding labor; the gap between strike and FMV is wage-equivalent. |
| Book advances + royalties | Direct authorship labor. |
| Speaking fees, consulting, advisory shares (vested) | Direct labor compensation, in-kind or cash. |
| ✗ Counter-examples (out) | Why |
|---|---|
| Inheritance, family gifts | No labor; pure transfer. |
| Lottery / one-off settlements unrelated to labor | No labor causation. |
| Spousal income | Not the issuer's labor; covenant is with the individual, not the household. |
| Property insurance proceeds | Asset replacement; no labor link. |
| Loans (principal received, not interest paid) | Liability incurred, not income earned. |
Test 2 · Asset origination
Does the income arise from an asset that exists because of the issuer’s past human capital?
| ✓ Examples (in TEB) | Why |
|---|---|
| K-1 partnership distributions on a firm the issuer founded | The firm exists because of the issuer's labor; distributions are derivative. |
| Founder dividends from a company the issuer built and still controls | Asset = company; company exists because of the issuer's labor. |
| Music-catalog royalties (issuer wrote the songs) | Asset = catalog; catalog exists because of the issuer's labor. |
| Patent licensing revenue (issuer is the inventor) | Asset = patent; patent exists because of the issuer's labor. |
| GP carry on funds where the issuer is GP | Carry compensates GP labor (vehicle exists because of the GP). |
| Earn-outs on an acquired company the issuer founded | Deferred consideration for founding labor. |
| ✗ Counter-examples (out) | Why |
|---|---|
| Dividends on a stock portfolio the issuer bought with savings | Asset exists because of someone else's labor; issuer is just an investor. |
| Rental income from arm's-length real estate | Asset is real property; not human-capital-originated. |
| Interest on savings | Asset is cash; capital return, not human-capital return. |
| Inherited family business dividends — pre-issuer-involvement portion | Asset existed before issuer's labor (see basis-ratio rule below). |
| LP returns on a fund where the issuer is just an LP | LP capital, not GP carry; no labor causation. |
Why it matters —Both tests are inclusive: if either Test 1 or Test 2 passes, the income is in TEB. Most income events pass at most one test cleanly; the framework rarely needs both.
Edge cases run through the framework
Realized → financial conversion
Issuer earns $400K W-2 in year, immediately invests $300K into an index fund. Index fund returns $30K in dividends in year 2.
TEB year 1: $400K (W-2 passes Test 1). TEB year 2:$0 from the index fund — those dividends arise from a stock portfolio asset that doesn’t exist because of the issuer’s labor (it exists because the issuer parked savings there). Test 2 fails.
GP carry vs co-invest
Issuer is GP of a venture fund. Earns $200K base salary (Test 1 ✓), $1M GP carry on fund exit (asset = fund, fund exists because of GP labor, Test 2 ✓), and $400K LP return on their own personal capital co-invested into the same fund.
TEB: $200K + $1M = $1.2M. The $400K co-invest return is LP-side capital return, not GP labor-derived; out.
Inherited business — basis-ratio bifurcation
Issuer inherits a family company at 35 (no prior involvement). Spends 5 years actively running it; revenue grows from $5M to $20M. Then sells for $30M.
Pre-involvement basis: $5M. Post-involvement basis: $20M. Bifurcate: attributable to inherited (out of TEB); attributable to issuer’s 5-year build-out (in TEB).
Retired founder — ongoing dividends
Issuer founded company at 25, exited operationally at 50, retains 20% ownership. At 65, receives $200K/yr in dividends from that ownership.
TEB:$200K (Test 2 ✓ — asset is the company, company exists because of issuer’s past labor). Even though current labor is zero, the perpetual claim on past human-capital-originated assets is in.
Crypto trader
Issuer makes $500K in year from crypto trading. Two readings:
If the trading is full-time and skill-based: Test 1 ✓ (the trading IS the labor). TEB = $500K. If it’s passive HODLing of past purchases: Test 2 fails (crypto isn’t labor-originated for a buy-and-hold investor) and Test 1 doesn’t obviously pass. Out of TEB.
The platform’s default rule: declared trading-as-business (Schedule C, Mark-to-Market election under §475(f)) → in TEB. Capital-gains-only treatment → out.
Content creator reinvesting into the show
Creator earns $2M from sponsorship and ad-share, reinvests $1.4M back into production (crew salaries, equipment).
TEB: $2M gross. The reinvestment is a business expense; net pre-tax is what the creator takes home, but TEB is the gross labor-originated income. The covenant applies to the gross. (See gross/net section for nuance on legitimate business expenses.)
Anti-dodge provisions
The principle is unambiguous, but enforcement against gaming requires explicit closures of four common evasion paths:
1 · C-corp parking
Attempted dodge: route labor income through a wholly-owned C-corp; the C-corp retains the cash; the issuer takes minimum salary. TEB looks small.
Resolution — IRC §542 personal holding company look-through: if the C-corp is a personal holding company under §542 (60%+ of AGI from personal-services contracts), look through to the underlying labor income. Retained earnings count as deferred TEB accruing in the year earned, not the year paid.
2 · Deferred comp games
Attempted dodge: structure compensation as deferred-comp arrangement maturing post-covenant. Pre-covenant earnings spike, post-covenant the deferred amounts vest tax-free to the covenant.
Resolution — IRC §409A constructive-receipt accrual: treat deferred comp as received (and counted in TEB) at the point of constructive receipt, which under §409A is generally when the substantial risk of forfeiture lapses. Vesting schedules accrue TEB at vest, not at payout.
3 · Alpha bifurcation (PM / hedge fund managers)
Attempted dodge:portfolio manager bifurcates their personal trading book from their hedge-fund book; claims the personal trading is “just investment” and out of TEB.
Resolution — filed-benchmark rule with default-zero: for any active-management role, the issuer must declare a benchmark (e.g. S&P 500 + 200bp) at listing; alpha above the benchmark on personal capital is in TEB. If no benchmark is filed, default to zero alpha attribution (i.e., all returns treated as LP-style passive) — which leaves the bifurcation dodge with nothing to hide behind on the firm side.
4 · Inherited dividends bifurcation game
Attempted dodge: declare an inherited business but never separate pre-vs-post involvement; claim all dividends are inherited (out of TEB).
Resolution — basis-ratio bifurcation rule: the inherited portion of cash flow equals (basis at inheritance) / (basis at present) of dividends. The issuer must document the two basis values with valuation reports; any unsupportable basis is treated as zero-pre-involvement and 100% TEB.
Special cases
Death or permanent incapacity
Phase 1: covenant terminates; tokens convert early to a Phase 2 stake against the estate’s ongoing TEB (royalties, trust distributions). Phase 2: standard succession — claim continues against ongoing TEB. Not a total-loss scenario for backers.
Stopped working (minimum-effort floor)
Issuer “retires” mid-Phase 1 and TEB drops to zero while issuer is still capable. Covenant-level governance: a minimum-effort floor applies (e.g., median TEB of trailing 3 reporting periods, or sector-conditional median). Backers can invoke the deficiency-and-cure framework. This is a covenant-level governance question, not a lock-level one — see pre-IPO lock spec, edge cases.
Joint filers
Married filing jointly: covenant is with the individual, not the household. Spousal income is excluded; issuer’s portion of joint income (W-2 line, K-1 K1-line) is in. Schedule C and Schedule E entries are individual-attributable by default.
Equity compensation timing
ISOs/NSOs: TEB accrues at vest (not at grant) at FMV-on-vest. ISO exercise pre-AMT: AMT-adjusted spread counted in year of exercise. Sale at later date: appreciation between vest and sale is capital-gains return, not TEB.
Non-cash consideration
Tokens, equity, perks above IRS thresholds: counted at FMV at time of receipt. Subsequent appreciation/depreciation is capital gain, not TEB.
Gross or net?
TEB is gross of personal taxes but net of legitimate business expenses for self-employed and pass-through entities. The distinction:
- —Personal taxes (federal income, FICA, state) are not deducted from TEB. The covenant’s share rate is computed on gross income; this matches how creditors and ISA originators have historically operated.
- —Legitimate business expenses (Schedule C deductions for COGS, equipment, contractors) are deducted. The economic activity that produced the income required these expenditures.
- —Salary parked in a personal C-corp is in TEB pre-deduction (under the §542 anti-dodge rule above). Issuer can’t deduct “salary to themselves” to escape the covenant.
TEB as audit object — three layers
| Layer | What it is | Source of truth |
|---|---|---|
| Conceptual | The principle: human-capital-proximate income | This page + the math doc |
| Operational | Quarterly attestation by the issuer with attached evidence — Plaid feed snapshots, K-1s, 1099s, brokerage tax reports | On-platform reporting + issuer attestation |
| Enforcement | Annual reconciliation against the issuer's filed federal tax return (Form 1040, Schedule C/E, K-1 schedule) | Tax-return PDF cross-checked by Preflop's review team |
The three layers move from principle to evidence to legal backstop. A discrepancy between the operational layer (what the issuer reports quarterly) and the enforcement layer (what the tax return shows) triggers the deficiency-and-cure framework.
International issuers
The framework is principle-grounded, so it ports across jurisdictions, but the two-test mechanics rely on US tax-code definitions (IRC §542, §409A, §475(f)). For non-US issuers:
- —The issuer’s home jurisdiction’s analogous code provisions are used (UK SA-100 + CT600, Canadian T1 + T2, EU PIT regimes, etc.)
- —Currency conversion uses the daily IRS reference rate at end of reporting period
- —Cross-border issuers (US tax resident with foreign-source income) follow US treatment for the covenant
- —Specific country supplements maintained by Preflop’s legal team and posted on listing approval
Read the full spec
Complete derivations, every edge case, every anti-dodge rationale, and the international supplement live in PreFlop/wiki/The-Math-Theoretical-Foundation.md Part 1.1.